| Jumping to inevitabilities | | Print | |
| InFocus Features - Editorials | ||||||
| Written by JACK HABERER, Outlook editor | ||||||
| Monday, 20 February 2012 04:25 | ||||||
|
Don’t jump to conclusions. The Fellowship of Presbyterians has launched a new denomination, the Evangelical Covenant Order of Presbyterians (ECO), signaling yet another structural divide in the mainline Presbyterian Church family (see pp. 12-16). But it remains to be seen whether this will produce a split or just a splinter. That depends on us. All of us.
The session of First Church, Colorado Springs, has voted to leave to points undetermined, although pastor Jim Singleton serves as provisional president of the Fellowship – the organization set up mostly to support evangelicals staying in the PC(USA). And John Crosby’s election as provisional president of the new denomination doesn’t mean that his congregation, Christ Church, Edina, Minn., is ready to make the move. It’s too early to tell what the other three leaders’ churches will do, although proposals to change the definition of marriage, if adopted at the next General Assembly, could provide the tipping point that would lead them out. To their credit, these seven (plus Tae-Hyung Ko and Dana Allin who now fill the board chairs vacated by Toone and Swanson) have not imposed a one-size-fits-all plan on their constituents. Then again, most of the options still signal a separation going on in this church family. Attempts to resist such a separation have been contending with the forces of inevitability. American Protestant history could well be summarized by a modified version of the legend of Hans Brinker, the little Dutch boy holding his finger in the dike. An ever-rising tide of ecclesiastical change has pressed on those seeking to hold it back. However, to amend the story, the dam actually gives way and the surviving thumb-pluggers feel forced to move to higher ground to start anew. While many of those ecclesiastical changes have advanced our mission – e.g., the end of slavery, the spread of human rights – some changes have not – e.g., the loss of Sunday Sabbath-keeping. For good and for ill, the forces of change, what historian Lefferts Loetscher called the “Broadening Church” in a book by that title, have relentlessly beaten down the dam of conservative resistance, and every so often conservatives have raised white flags and started anew – in search of higher ground, believing that to be the better path to faithfulness. In some cases (think: the Pentecostal movement) their departures have launched worldwide movements. In some cases the departures have produced isolated enclaves of agreement. No one knows what will come of the new denomination, the ECO. But hundreds of our congregations will study its theological and polity documents, prayerfully asking God if they should join. They will be listening to the voices of the rest of us, too. Will we shun those looking for creative ways to stay in the PC(USA)? Many churches do not want to leave, or cannot. Will they be ostracized for even contemplating a move? Will pastors get blackballed, will sessions get coerced, will congregations get harassed, if they don’t happily go along with changes contrary to their perception of God’s will? The changes in ordination standards have brought great joy to the many who believe that the church’s complicity in perpetuating injustices against lesbian and gay persons had to end. The changes testify to their persevering determination to change the system, even if that meant overwhelming the little Dutch boy trying to hold back those waters. What remains is the question: Will they require a one-size-fits-all model for those for whom these recent changes have brought heartbreak? Let’s not jump to conclusions. And let’s not jump or force others to jump ship. —JHH Your Responses (3)
![]()
Tom Eggebeen
said:
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Thanks Jack ... thoughtful commentary, with a reminder to us all that our history is less than propitious. I think your comments about the tide of justice that has constantly moved the church to a better place are well-conceived. Not everything, as you say, has worked, but those groups devoted to purity over peace rarely ever achieve the purity they desire, and rarely the peace they hope for. And so it goes ... good piece Jack. |
Michael Carey
said:
|
Satellite Beach, FL Correction--The Session of First Presbyterian Church, Colorado Springs did in fact voted to recommend to its members that the church be dismissed into ECO. At least 24 congregations have already started the ECO application process--in a month, already a sizeable "splinter." |
p.w. gregory
said:
|
lambertville, nj I think any random walk down the history of the Presbyterian flavor in America, Old Light-New Light, Fundamentalist-Modernist, Civil War, The Culture Wars, will lead one to conclude we do allot of talking, much writing, more big pronoucements, always trying the purge the corruption from the pure, with mixed results. The Orthodox Presbyterians have been fighting 1933 and Machen since 1933, how is working working out for them? As I have stated, the PCUSA as a system, an entity, currently is suffering from prolonged exposure to stress, turbulence, shocks, insults to the system. A period of rest, reflection, prayer, assessment, and thoughtful processing of all that has been done is called for. And time and space to allow people, churches, and all they value to see were they are and may wish to be. To those who would go to lengths to repress people or otherwise poison the water in aspects of property, power, control of assets, or otherwise bring a heavy-hand in dealing with churches and people who may wish to leave I counsel that people tend to forget rather quickly the minor details of polity, but they remember forever, and for generations how they were treated leaving, going out the door. They shall remember forever how others make them feel. Humiliate a man today, his great-grandsons remember, and carry the pain. Those who have ears----- Another aspect to Presbyterian history is not just schism, but also reunion. Not that EPC, RPC folks will come back to the mother church anytime soon, but there is precident for such. The PCUSA has some very clear choices in Pittsburgh. It is not so much how we treat people coming in the door, but how we treat them leaving that show one's true character. We will see. |















