Become our Friend on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Font Size: +A -A RESET
Room in the inn
Written by Jack Haberer, Outlook editor   
Monday, 30 November 2009 06:08
Many a story, many a poem, many a carol has been written about the experience of Mary and Joseph finding “no room in the inn.” For them it was no mere sentimentality that they had to eat, sleep and give birth in a smelly stable-cave. And that happened in their family’s hometown.

Imagine what it’s like today for those who can’t call your hometown their hometown, or for that matter, your home country their home country.

Jesus may have been alluding to his parents’ experience when, in speaking of the divide between the sheep and goats, he declared that the sheep are those who not only feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, care for the sick and visit the imprisoned, but also are those who see strangers and welcome them.

Most of our churches have caught on to the fact that the Christian mission requires us to pour resources and time into fulfilling the first five of those forms of service. But which of us opens our homes to strangers? Or which of us turns non-citizen strangers – yes, you can call them illegal aliens, if you will – into houseguests? Do we even see the strangers around us?

There still is no room in the inn.

It seems so strange to me that we American Christians have such a difficult time with this. Given that only five per cent of us have any native American or native Alaskan blood and less than one per cent (2.4 million) are pure native American or native Alaskan, you would think that the rest of us would share enough family memory to either replicate the welcome received or to determine to improve upon it for the sake of those who follow us here.

Yet the scorning of immigrants has become a national pastime.   

Yes, you can say you don’t hate them, you just want them to follow the law. But as Julia Thorne asks (see p. 8), are we always to follow the law, or should we do what is right, legal or not? It was illegal to shelter Jews during the Nazi Holocaust, yet today we celebrate the courage of Christians who did so. What about sheltering victims of our unjust laws?

Our laws are unjust. Nobody in Washington believes our immigration policy is working. No matter where they stand on the political spectrum, all legislators know something needs to change.

What’s holding them back? You and I are. Our elected leaders are doing nothing about the immigration situation out of fear of facing a backlash from their constituents. The folks who voted them into office naturally look out for their own, and concerns for job loss, for drug smuggling, for crowded classrooms, for increased taxes, and fear-of-the-other trump all concern for the millions of basically good folks who have come here for the same reasons most of our forebears came: to flee poverty and to provide for their families.

Our denomination has called for immigration reform for years. More recently the National Association of Evangelicals has raised its voice. “Our current immigration system is broken,” said Leith Anderson, NAE President, on Oct. 8 after its board adopted a resolution calling for reform of the immigration policies. “Efforts to maintain secure and efficient borders have been ineffective and, too often, inhumane. Our visa system for legal immigration is antiquated, bureaucratic, and insufficient to meet both labor force and family reunification needs. Those who want to play by the rules, both employers and employees, often have no realistic options.”

In the case of Mary and Joseph, it wasn’t just the innkeeper who had no room. It was the government – given King Herod’s edict demanding the killing of firstborn sons. Thanks to a God-given dream, the magi valued this newborn child more than the king. By defying the royal decree they saved the life of the one who would save the lives of countless others. Sometimes we need just to do the right thing, like making room in our hearts for Jesus — and for those of whom he said, “As you did it to one of the least of these, you did it to me.”

 

—    JHH
Trackback(0)
Your Responses (7)Add Comment
Response from Robert Hughes, December 08, 2009
Houston, Texas
A nation without borders is no nation at all. For years, policies such as those recommended in your editorial been our de facto border policies and have allowed drugs to flow freely across our borders. It is not only the people who enter our home by sneaking through the window rather than ringing the doorbell who destroy our nation by demanding free education, food, medical care, and housing. It is the politicians and people such as yourself who ignore the massive drug problem and violence/gun smuggling which result from loose border policies. The same people who promote the killing of unborn children work to keep the borders porous and the drugs and guns flowing.

My wife is an immigrant, and we know many immigrants. Our immigration policy is a shambles, but it is kept that way so that millions of people can sneak through our border windows to pillage our homes. Immigrants who enter legally are very welcome in this country. Thieves who steal their way into the country, drive without insurance, do not buy medical insurance, and send their money home without paying taxes in this country need to be recognized as the scavengers they are. There are many ways to help them and many policy changes which could improve this situation, but ignoring crime and choosing to support criminals over lawabiding citizens does not say much for you or the organizations which you represent.
Response from Glen Hallead, December 02, 2009
Wellsboro, PA
As others have raised the banner cry of the strange connection made between "illiegal immigrants" and Joseph and Mary in this article, I too find myself wondering about the strange hermeneutic involved in making that connection. Would we be as quick to make a connection between Mr. Haberer's comment on "by defying the royal decree they saved the life of one who would save the lives of countless others" with pro-life sentiments concerning civil disobedience? Or would we as quickly make a connection on the relationship between abortion and Jesus' message of "as you did it to one of the least of these, you did it to me?"

It is a tangled web we weave when we sentimentalize texts through the welcome emotional warmth of the season to expedite an otherwise political end... While the two are not completely inseparable neither are they necessarily conjoined. Contextualization is everything...

Response from Ronald Owens, December 02, 2009
Fresno, Ca
Jack:

Toby Brown is apparently right about Goodwin's Law.

So I hope you'll take another swipe at this and avoid the obvious land mines. I am pastor to an American born teenager who had to mourn at a distance a grandparent's death in the old country because parents are apparently illegal. I would not seek any general amnesty. But surely we can do better than our current laws and the "send them all back and let them try again in another age" attitude of some of my own friends.
Response from Noel Anderson, December 01, 2009
Bakersfield, CA
This is a textbook example of begging the question.
Response from Mike Garrett, November 30, 2009
snellville, georgia
Jack:

I fail to see how the Christian response to shelter Jews from certain death at the hands of Nazi's translates into a Christian willingness to support immigration for whoever wants it for whatever reason. Our laws may be imperfect, and our immigration policies in need of reform, but they hardly constitute genocide.

A little more nuance please.
Response from Toby Brown, November 30, 2009
Butler, PA
Godwin's Law alert!

If you want us to take your arguments seriously and discuss them, comparing people with whom you disagree to Nazis is pretty much a conversation killer.
Response from John Erthein, November 30, 2009
Erie, PA
Jack, while I think one can make a strong argument from Christian moral principles for comprehensive immigration reform, I also think it is completely inappropriate to compare America's laws to those of Nazi Germany, in any way, shape, or form. People who come here in violation of our laws face deportation if they are apprehended. Perhaps that should not happen. But to compare deportation back to one's country of origin to what happened to Jews who were apprehended by the Nazis? That disgusts me. I think you have insulted victims of the Holocaust with this facile and frankly stupid comparison. This is the worst editorial you have ever written.

Write a Response
smaller | bigger
NOTE: Your response to an article will be reviewed by staff before it is made available to the public for reading. The delay may be a few minutes or it may be as long as 24 hours.

busy
 
Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner