Font Size: +A -A RESET
Re: OUTLOOK Forum; not voting (pub. Nov. 3, 2008) PDF Print E-mail
Letters to the Editor
Written by Richard Hong   
Friday, 07 November 2008 15:52

Each proposed amendment carries the following preface: "The 218th General Assembly directed the Stated Clerk to send the following proposed amendment to the presbyteries for their affirmative or negative votes."

It is therefore the constitutional responsibility of presbyteries to VOTE on the proposed amendments. Deciding to take "no action" has the same effect as a "no" vote — but it lacks the courage and legitimacy of an actual vote.

It disrespects the work of our GA commissioners to refuse to act on items properly sent to the presbyteries. It does not matter whether we agree or not. It does not matter whether we are tired of the issue or not. The business has been placed before us, and we are duty-bound to act.

How ironic is it that anyone could dare to suggest that we should handle a proposed amendment dealing with ordination vows by failing to honor our own ordination vow to abide by the polity of the church?

"No action" is not an honorable option. Vote with respect for all opinions. Vote with the love of God in your heart and with the Spirit guiding you. But vote yes or vote no — that is our duty.

Richard Hong
Englewood, N.J.

 
Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner