<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Post GA Letter</title>
		<description>Comments for Post GA Letter at http://www.pres-outlook.org , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.pres-outlook.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:05:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.pres-outlook.org/news-and-analysis3/46-ga-2008/7656-post-ga-letter.html#comment-4076</link>
			<description>I'm having difficulty with the parsing of words in this letter; specifically the change is to [u]replace[/u]versus the statement the assembly has not [u]removed[/u]the standard of fidelity in marriage and chastity in singleness.  
  It would appear by codifying 'local option' were this amendment to be approved by a majority of the Presbyteries, we've now opened the door to &quot;disUNITY&quot;.  Each Presbytery, Session, PNC (and appropriate COM) will now be responsible &quot;for discerning a candidate's fitness for ordination. This could get bogged down as a minimum and rather intense should a previously ordained Minister of the W&amp;S from 'liberal' Presbytery A be refused ordination/installation in 'evangelical' Presbytery B. Did the GA really consider the potential divisiveness of their actions?  Have they studied Romans 12 recently? Behavior is relevant according to Paul's Epistle.
  Given we lost a church per month and 5000 members per month for 2007, the PC(USA) is spiraling toward irrelevance.  That is most sad. - Dana GILMOUR</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:59:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

