| Panel's proposals would revamp special offerings |
| Written by Leslie Scanlon, Outlook national reporter | ||
| Wednesday, 15 February 2012 23:00 | ||
|
LOUISVILLE, Ky. – Over the next few months, leaders of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will consider whether to make changes in the denomination’s four special offerings. The Special Offerings Advisory Task Force has set a goal for the PC(USA) to raise $20 million from the offerings by 2020. It also is recommending that the General Assembly eliminate the Peacemaking Offering (funding peacemaking endeavors instead through the One Great Hour of Sharing offering) and that it create a new offering to support world mission. Karl Travis, a minister from Texas and chair of the task force, will be presenting the task force’s findings at the General Assembly Mission Council’s meeting in Louisville Feb. 15-17 – starting with the council’s Executive Committee Feb. 15. Travis ran through some of the reasons the task force is recommending changes to the General Assembly. Among them, he said:
Travis told the council that the $20 million goal – up from $13.7 million given to the four special offerings in 2010 – is a “reasonable goal.” Here’s more from the first day of the council’s meeting. Per capita. Meeting jointly for a short time, the Executive Committee and the Committee on the Office of the General Assembly proposed new per capita rates for the denomination – per member contributions that the General Assembly would have to approve. The proposed new per capita rates for each active member would be $6.80 in 2013 and $6.98 in 2014. That’s up from $6.63 currently – an increase over two years, if approved, of 35 cents per active member. Budget. The council is in the process of developing a budget for the council for 2013-2016 – what it calls a Mission Work Plan. It is expected to set that budget at its meeting in May, and to present the budget to the General Assembly for approval this summer. At this meeting, the council is considering six “directional goals” – the underlying principles it will use to build that budget, after a consultation process with Presbyterian leaders. Among them: to work with young adults; to nurture and sustain transformational leaders; and to create 1,001 new worshiping communities. Name change. The council will ask the 2012 General Assembly to authorize a name change for the council – in part because the term “council” is reserved under the PC(USA)’s new Form of Government for middle governing bodies. The proposal is to:
September meeting. Plans also have changed for the council’s meeting next fall, in September 2012. An invitation had been considered to hold that meeting in Seoul, Korea, in conjunction with the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the founding of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Korea. That has shifted because of what a report describes as “logistical challenges,” and the plan now is for the council to meet in September in Louisville instead. There will be other ways to honor the anniversary, as representatives of the Korean church will attend the PC(USA)’s General Assembly in Pittsburgh this summer. The council will send a delegation of PC(USA) leaders to Korea in September for the anniversary celebration as well. Your Responses (1)
![]()
James Cogswell
said:
|
|
Black Mountain, NC Letter to the Editor, Presbyterian Outlook Little has appeared in the Outlook to date about the recommendations of the Special Offerings Advisory Task Force which were approved by the General Assembly Mission Council at its meeting in February. While the Task Force report does an excellent analysis of the present situation regarding the four churchwide special offerings and has a number of excellent recommendations, its recommendations regarding the One Great Hour of Sharing (OGHS) is a cause of great concern to many. As one commentator has stated, the recommendation “would fundamentally alter the historic covenant between congregations and the General Assembly regarding church wide special offerings. {It would] convert [special offerings] essentially into general revenue streams, with the GAMC determining the allocations of each, while misleadingly retaining the special offering name for them.” During my 13 years as Director of the PCUS World Service/World Hunger program, I came to realize that OGHS is the lifeline for the compassion ministries of our denomination, providing the basic support for Presbyterian Disaster Assistance, Presbyterian Hunger Program, and Self-Development of People Program. Each of these ministries has its own distinctive history and mission. OGHS was initiated almost 65 years ago, responding to the desperate human need in Europe and Asia following the Second World War. U.S. Protestant denominations worked together to form Church World Service as the avenue for responding to this critical need. Through succeeding years, Church World Service has been the principal instrument through which we Presbyterians and other U.S. Protestants have responded to major disasters at home and abroad in the name of Christ. The Presbyterian Hunger Program was initiated in the former PCUS in response to the impending world hunger crisis. It paved the way for other major Protestant churches to address root causes of hunger, engaging in long-term development programs and addressing public policy issues related to world hunger. The Self-Development of People program originated in the former PCUSA following the civil rights crisis, with the purpose of “empowering the powerless” and helping the poor to help themselves through self-development projects. Together these three programs provide distinctive yet complementary avenues for us as Presbyterians and as Christian to respond to the victims of disaster, the hungry, the poor, the homeless and the oppressed in the name of Christ. OGHS has been by far the most successful and effective special offering of our denomination; over 87% of PCUSA congregations received the offering in 2011. The Special Offering Task Force’s recommendation proposes merging the Peacemaking Offering with OGHS; eliminating any reference to specific programs and simply naming certain topical areas of work; eliminating mandated percentage distribution for the offering, authorizing the General Assembly Mission Council to make decisions annually about how the funds are to be used, thus opening the possibility of churchwide special offering simply becoming part of the general income of the General Assembly. At a time when there is so much uncertainty in the life of our beloved denomination, we need the continuity that OGHS represents. I believe that what is involved here is the saving of the compassion ministries of our denomination as avenues for expressing the compassion of Christ for “the least of these”. |







